![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biblical Covenant Theology:Rituals, Signs, and Renewals ExplainedThe noun "Covenant" (Hebrew: brit) appears 287 times in the Old Testament, always in the singular. In the New Testament – (diatheke) – 33 times; 2/3 of these are quotations from the Old Testament; the rest are mostly in Paul. The Concept of "Covenant"The Covenant (Hebrew: brit, Greek: diatheke, Latin: testamentum) describes a mutual commitment, where either self-obligation, the obligation of another, or mutual commitment may take precedence. A covenant can establish a relationship between individuals, groups, or between human beings and God. Mutually binding community in the Old Testament is portrayed as self-commitment through God's promises on the one hand, and Israel's obligation through commandments on the other. The covenant creates a sphere of communal salvation (shalom) and covenant loyalty (chesed and zedaka) between God and His people. Whoever violates these commandments exits the sphere of covenantal blessing. Translation Problems"Karat berit" (Hebrew) = meaning "to establish an obligation." The German term "Bund" does not precisely match the Hebrew brit. 1. Brit does not denote a "relationship" but rather the "stipulation" or "obligation" assumed by the subject;
in such a context, brit can even mean a "pledge."
The content of such a brit as "self-commitment" must be derived from the context:
e.g., "to let (others) live" – Josh 9:15a. A self-obligation can be further confirmed by a curse ritual, where one passes between the parts of a sacrificed animal (Jer 34:15-19; Gen 15:17f.): If the pledge is not kept, the violator shall suffer the same fate as the animal. 2. The subject making the covenant can impose an obligation on the counterpart (2 Sam 3:12f.). 3. Mutual obligation (1 Kgs 5:26). 4. Establishment of a covenant by a third party (2 Kgs 11:17). 5. Different verbs are used for making (a), keeping (b), and breaking or annulling (c) a brit.
To forget (Deut 4:31) – from God's side. In today's language: "Contract"? And only in written form? The Old Testament describes several covenant-making events. In prophetic tradition, the idea of covenant was eschatologized: Jer 31:31–34 – the law will be written on the hearts of Israel. Attempts to clarify the etymology of brit are diverse:
In the Ancient Near East, covenants were usually sealed on a stone or with a stone monument A kind of "standard form" can be recognized, and the contract form identified as a fixed literary genre. The texts demonstrate a high educational level among their scribes: they were jurists interested in precise wording, diplomats who understood fine nuances, and historians familiar with archives. The contracts have been preserved in clay tablet copies. Materials for original documents included iron, silver, and gold. The original and a possible duplicate were laid before or at the feet of the main deities of the contracting parties. Vassals were often instructed to regularly hear the reading of the contract text to ensure familiarity with its contents. The covenant format in the Old Testament parallels the structure of Ancient Near Eastern state treaties. The covenant is made "forever." Renewal is required only if the covenant is broken. A confirmation takes place when Israel changes leadership. This later led to the transformation into the concept of "testament." Hittite texts highlight the significance of writing: "My grandfather showed him mercy. A contract tablet was written..." A document is an inseparable part of the contract. Today, covenants/contracts are no longer written on stone Against the 6 Theses of J. McCarthy:
His conclusion: One should not draw too close a parallel between the Old Testament theological *berit* and Hittite treaty texts. Covenant Ceremony
Festive Meal
Other Ceremonies for Obligations
External Signs of the Covenant
Covenant Renewal
Recording
Köhler in "Th. of the OT": "The entire covenant was encapsulated in the word: 'I will take you as my own people, and I will be your God' (Ex 6:7). The covenant thus exists without any historical or territorial perspective." Maritext: The overlord mediates peace between warring tribes. In the covenant mediation, the sacrifice of a donkey plays a role. Thematic Overviews
Interpretations of Covenant Theology
1) When transferred to the theological realm, "brit" refers to the relationship between God and humanity. The subject of the "brit" is usually God, signifying either God's self-obligation or the obligation imposed by God on humanity. 2) God's self-obligation toward various recipients:
Covenants are made between:
In certain cases, the covenant is mediated by a third party. Especially in covenants with God, a man of God (priest, prophet, etc.) mediates — thus Moses (Ex 24) and Joshua (Josh 24) mediate the covenant between God and Israel. The covenant usually has "eternal validity": in divine covenants (Gen 9:12) but also in secular treaties (1 Sam 20:15). Sabbath, rainbow, and circumcision represent the three great covenants that God established at critical stages of history: at Creation (Gen 2:3; Ex 31:16f.), at the restoration of humanity after the Flood (Gen 9:1-17), and at the formation of the Hebrew people (Gen 17). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Donation © 2012 - 2025 |
|